Supreme Court warns of EIGHT MONTH wait for Feed-in Tariff appeal

by ClickGreen staff. Published Wed 25 Jan 2012 14:25, Last updated: 2012-01-25
Huhne appeal to take eight months
Huhne appeal to take eight months

The Supreme Court has this afternoon warned a final appeal by Energy Ministers over the High Court ruling on Feed-in Tariffs will take around eight months to reach its courtrooms.

A spokesman said because the Court of Appeal had refused leave to appeal to the highest court in the land, it would take two months before permission to seek a ruling could even be granted.

Ben Wilson of the Supreme Court told ClickGreen it would take an initial eight weeks before a panel of three senior judges could even decide if permission for the appeal to be heard would be allowed.

“It will take this long to prepare and lodge the papers,” he said. “And then, on the basis of the written submissions, it would be for the Supreme Court Justices to decide if there is a significant issue regarding a point of law of importance to the general public.”

If DECC is successful in seeking a final hearing, it would then take a further six months to organise a full appeal hearing before the Supreme Court.

“This will probably take a year to reach the Supreme Court,” Ben added. “If there is a case for the matter to be heard urgently this period of time can be contracted – but not significantly.”

It is understood that because the Court of Appeal this morning refused leave to appeal to the Supreme Court, the three appeal judges are indicating the likelihood of permission being granted is extremely remote as they feel there is no ambiguity over the points of law.

Following this morning's decision, Energy Secretary Chris Huhne, said in a statement: "The Court of Appeal has upheld the High Court ruling on FITs albeit on different grounds. We disagree and are seeking permission to appeal to the Supreme Court.

“We have already put before Parliament changes to the regulations that will bring a 21p rate into effect from April for solar pv installations from 3 March to help reduce the pressure on the budget and provide as much certainty as we can for consumers and industry.

“We want to maximise the number of installations that are possible within the available budget rather than use available money to pay a higher tariff to half the number of installations. Solar PV can have strong and vibrant future in UK and we want a lasting FITs scheme to support that future and jobs in the industry.”

David Hunt of renewable energy company Eco Environments, said in reaction to news of the eight-month delay: "It is somewhat embarrassing that the Government, after losing two court cases are looking to the Supreme Court.

"The Government are clearly looking to keep the water muddy for consumers, trying to drag uncertainty on to the 3rd March. This is yet another snub to the solar industry, and proves without doubt that this is very far from the 'greenest government ever'.

"It is in our opinion the government would fail in any further appeals, and maintaining confusion is their goal. Frankly we're disgusted that they are taking this course of action."






Sign up to receive ClickGreen's FREE weekly newsletter with a review of all the latest green news and views

Opt Out



Comments about Supreme Court warns of EIGHT MONTH wait for Feed-in Tariff appeal

The damage has been done. How can we confidently proceed with training and investment under this cloud of doubt. This is only year 2 of FIT!
Thames Renewables, UK around 3 months, 3 weeks ago
I wouldn't trust Chris Huhne to drive my car let alone make decisions on the environment. Funny how they represent US when canvassing votes!
Peter Reeves, Poole Dorset around 3 months, 3 weeks ago
We had a real chance to put our case on the media tonight. (Ch 4 News). As usual we blew it. Our industry is unable to put up a case.
Charles, West Wales around 3 months, 3 weeks ago
David Cameron's speech today talks about respecting National Courts decisions being respected - Human Rights or FiT, whats the difference?
Chris, Cambridge around 3 months, 3 weeks ago
These (ex)-MP's win if the mud puts off people from installing PV by 3 March. Shame on them and the TV news for implying the DECC may win.
Mike Johns-Turner, South West around 3 months, 3 weeks ago
This is getting ridiculous,why does the solar industry not just accept the 21p which is much more sustainable. Let us move on PLEASE !!
john esslemont, Aberdeen around 3 months, 3 weeks ago
The so called Government have lost the plot they cant break the laws they make and destroy businesses with knee jerk childs play GROW UP.
babba, everywhere around 3 months, 3 weeks ago
Use the money from the hair brained scheme to put create a new train line and meet the requirement of the kyoto treaty. Simple solution.
Robin Bowen, Good Life Inc Narberth around 3 months, 3 weeks ago
Its Hardly surpising that Huhne cant make his mind up he cant even remeber who was driving his car when he got stopped for driving !
LC, Dorset around 3 months, 3 weeks ago
No wonder no1 trusts the Government, they should be setting an example to follow the UKs laws and learn to take no for an answer
Adam, Merseyside around 3 months, 3 weeks ago
What is it with Chris Huhne and court cases? Eight months more uncertainty for the industry is the last thing it, or the country, needs.
Dave F, London around 3 months, 3 weeks ago
Barker and Huhne really are a bunch of muppets however the appeal process taking a year or so does not change 6 week window at 43p remainin
chris P, surrey around 3 months, 3 weeks ago
Barker and Huhne need to go, they just dont get it! This action driven behind the scenes by the utilities will destroy the green deal
paul williams, uk around 3 months, 3 weeks ago


Post a comment






Alert me of replies

You have characters left


 

















Powered by Click Creative
© All Rights Reserved.